Craig Schwarze is an environmental regulatory compliance expert with more than 30 years of hands-on experience assisting clients to achieve and maintain compliance nationwide. He has provided environmental compliance support to more than 400 private companies and Federal agencies, ranging from steel mills to the US Army, and has led environmental compliance assistance audits for more than 350 facilities in 42 states, and has been approved by multiple EPA regions, the Department of Justice, and several state environmental departments as a third-party compliance evaluator. Mr. Schwarze is the President of Aarcher Institute and has served as an instructor since 2005, helping to deliver training to more than 9,000 students. He has been awarded a Certified Instructional Trainer for Environmental, Health, and Safety (CIT) certification based on this experience and knowledge of adult education methods.
Christine Jochim is a partner in the Environment, Land, and Natural Resources group of K&L Gates LLP. With two decades of legal and public policy experience, Christine focuses her practice primarily on the defense of complex enforcement actions involving alleged violations of state and federal environmental, health, and safety regulations. Christine routinely advises clients on compliance with environmental laws and regulations and coordinates closely with the firm’s Policy and Regulatory Group on legislative and regulatory developments. While serving in both in-house and private practice roles, Christine has resolved environmental and other enforcement actions taken by the US Environmental Protection Agency, the US Department of Interior, and the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration, among other regulatory agencies at both the state and federal levels. She represents domestic and international clients in a range of legal forums, including state and federal courts, administrative tribunals, regulatory hearings, and alternative dispute resolution proceedings. Christine returned to the firm in early 2024 after serving in-house as senior environmental counsel to a multinational energy company.
Fuel storage tank systems are commonly used to store fuel for emergency generators, backup feed for boilers, and for vehicle and aircraft fueling. Infrastructure maintenance, capital planning, and environmental compliance go hand in hand in our fast-paced world. In general, fuel storage tanks have four (4) key stages: planning and design, acquisition and installation, operation and maintenance, and decommissioning and replacement. These fuel systems, like other mechanical infrastructures, have estimated service lives based on all four primary stages of their life cycles. If the systems are designed and installed properly, the longest phase is the operation and maintenance portion of their lives. During this portion of their life (often between 20 and 40 years), regular inspections and testing, preventative maintenance, ongoing repairs, and continuous compliance monitoring and recordkeeping can help prolong their service life. This talk will address the four primary stages of the AST lifecycle and how environmental managers can successfully develop a capital improvement plan.
This presentation will explore the evolving landscape of environmental regulation and enforcement, highlighting federal and state trends, emerging priorities, and practical strategies for compliance professionals.
We will begin by examining the current landscape of enforcement under key statutes such as the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, alongside recent developments in environmental justice requirements at the state level. Case studies will illustrate how enforcement actions—ranging from civil penalties to criminal prosecutions—are shaping industry behavior and influencing compliance programs. We will also discuss proactive measures organizations can adopt to mitigate risk and ensure readiness. Topics include:
Finally, we will discuss practical engagement with regulators and stakeholders, emphasizing transparency, documentation, and adaptive compliance strategies in an era of shifting political and regulatory priorities.
Participants will leave with actionable insights to strengthen compliance programs, reduce liability exposure, and foster a culture of environmental stewardship.
Environmental managers considering whether SPCC regulations apply to their operations are often focused on whether their facility has a "reasonable expectation” that discharge of oil may reach Waters of the United States (WOTUS). How should that determination be made (and documented) by the regulated community and how does EPA evaluate the facility's determination? We will discuss strategies for evaluating regulatory applicability, documenting the decision-making process, and avoiding common compliance determination mistakes.
Managing risks has a long and storied history with periods of major moves forward in terms of sophistication and impact. The key stakeholders in risk management, which includes environmental compliance professionals, have over time seen varying degrees of interest in their contributions to the overall risk strategy, for better or for worse. Before the turn of the century, alignment among and understanding between these stakeholders and risk leaders was often weak at best and completely disconnected at worst. Our keynote speaker will outline how and why this work must be done to both protect and enhance organizational assets and explain how and why environmental compliance professionals have a significant role to play in managing the organizational risk profile with excellence.
This presentation will focus on practical realities of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS regulation and what environmental compliance managers should be doing today to meeting new requirements and prepare for what is on the horizon. Stay tuned for more details.
This presentation will focus on real-life examples of chemical accidents and practical lessons learned relating to chemical management, particularly as they pertain to facility-level environmental compliance management, based on the investigations of CSB. Stay tuned for more details.
For decades, facility owners and/or operators have misunderstood certain SPCC rule requirements when both developing and implementing plans, creating costly compliance challenges that could have been avoided or in some case may result in oil discharges from the facility. This presentation will present a series of real-life non-compliance situations illustrating the finer points of SPCC rule's regulatory requirements and how SPCC inspectors might interpret compliance in the field, helping environmental managers avoid problems at their own facilities.
The new Clean Water Act (CWA) Hazardous Substances Facility Response Plan (FRP) rule was promulgated on March 28, 2024, and is found at new section 40 CFR 118. Due to the complexity of developing appropriate response plans, facilities should make their determination of the applicability of the new rule at least six months prior to the deadline to submit their FRP to the EPA by June 1, 2027. The rule expands facility response planning to the list of 296 CWA hazardous substances found in 40 CFR 116.4, which includes volatile organic compounds (VOCs), organic and inorganic toxic chemicals, acids and bases and water treatment chemicals to name a few. There are significant differences between the CWA FRP and the current FRP required under the Oil Pollution Prevention regulation found in Subpart D at 40 CFR 112.20. Due to the wide variety of physical and chemical properties of CWA hazardous substances, development of appropriate release response activities will be complex, may include dispersion modeling and planning for overland travel and damage to public areas such as docks, parks, recreational areas and other public spaces. This talk will discuss the rule requirements for FRP development, the challenges associated with developing appropriate response actions for different classes of chemicals, and strategies for complying with the new rule.
Environmental compliance managers understand the need to achieve and maintain environmental compliance for their organizations, and the risk of potential enforcement actions where compliance falls short. A look at the regulated community through the eyes of state and federal environmental agencies can add a new perspective to their work. Stay tuned for more details.
Mr. Mandel is a certified risk management professional (CRMP) with more than 30 years of executive experience in large global corporate risk management. He was previously named “Risk Manager of the Year” by the Risk Management Society (RIMS), for whom he served as president and 7-year board member. RIMS awarded him a lifetime achievement award (Goodell) in 2016, and he was voted in as a member of Risk Who’s Who (RWW). He is recognized by his peers as a thought leader in risk management and related disciplines, teaching and writing for various organizations including RIMS, George Mason University, and ICCIE. Mr. Mandel has numerous certifications and designations including CPCU, ARME, RIMS-CRMP, AIC, and DCRO.
As Chief Risk Officer at USAA, he pioneered the development of the advanced risk management strategy, where S&P rated USAA as “excellent” and a “leader in Enterprise Risk Management” for five consecutive years during his tenure. His career also included risk related leadership roles at Liberty Mutual, Marsh, Verizon, American National Red Cross, YUM Brands, and PepsiCo. He was the SVP, Strategic Solutions for Sedgwick and the Founding Director of the Sedgwick Institute.
Chris Mandel provides risk consulting and services as assistant professor teaching enterprise risk management in the worldwide college of business at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.
Nelson Brooks is a registered professional engineer and a professional geologist with more than 25 years of experience in environmental compliance, engineering design/permitting, environmental and hazardous waste site investigations and assessments. He is certified as an Aboveground Storage Tank (AST) Inspector by the Steel Tank Institute and Underground Tank Inspector by the Maryland Department of the Environment. Nelson designs, permits, inspects, and provides on-call engineering support for aboveground and underground storage tanks nationwide, but primarily in the Mid-Atlantic region. His experience includes operation, performance, and regulatory compliance. Nelson has completed a multitude of fuel tank system designs ranging from 300-gallon diesel fuel emergency generator systems to 50,000-gallon boiler fuel systems for both public and private clients.
Mr. Brooks currently serves as Mid-Atlantic Tank Program Manager with EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC., an environmental consulting firm that provides environmental, compliance, natural resources, and infrastructure engineering and management solutions to a wide range of public and private sector clients.
Ms. Belhateche is a professional engineer with more than 35 years of consulting, operational, and engineering experience in the environmental field, with a major focus on providing industrial multi-media environmental compliance support to facility personnel. She has performed projects for diverse industrial facilities, such as petroleum refineries, petrochemical and plastics manufacturing facilities, upstream and offshore oil and gas exploration and production sites, power generation plants, metal forging and electroplating plants and other manufacturing plants. She has led numerous multi-media compliance audits at industrial facilities to assess compliance with federal, state, and local environmental regulations and she has prepared hundreds of spill response plans for these types of facilities. Ms. Belhateche is the vice president and environmental technical director for compliance and permitting at Braun Intertec, an environmental consulting firm.